Click here for Reading 2 Chelsea 2 Video Goals 30/1/13
Chelsea vs Reading 2012 ( Chelsea Reading VIDEO BELOW)
Final score and result:- Chelsea vs Reading 4-2 ( Lampard pen, Cahill, Torres, Ivanovic/ Guthrie, Pogrebnyak)
Stamford Bridge, London- 22 August, 2012- Wednesday- 19.45 UK- 22/8/2012
A controversial Fernando Torres goal helps Chelsea see off the challenge of a plucky Reading side as the Blues come from 2-1 down to register a 4-2 win.
Chelsea vs Reading 1-0 ( Frank Lampard penalty vs Reading 18′)
Chelsea v Reading 1-1 ( Pavel Pogrebnyak goal v Chelsea 25′)
Chelsea v Reading 1-2 ( Danny Guthrie goal v Chelsea 29′)
Chelsea vs Reading 2-2 ( Gary Cahill goal vs Reading 69′)
Chelsea vs Reading 3-2 ( Fernando Torres goal vs Reading 81′)
Chelsea vs Reading 4-2 ( Branislav Ivanovic goal vs Reading 90+5′)
Chelsea vs Reading 2012 attendance:- 41,733 ( Referee- Mason)
Chelsea starting lineup vs Reading 2012:- Cech, Ivanovic, Cahill, Terry, Cole, Mikel, Lampard, Ramires, Eden Hazard, Mata, Torres
Reading starting XI v CFC 2012:- Federici, Gunter, Pearce, Gorkss, Harte, Karacan, McAnuff, Leigertwood, Guthrie, McCleary, Pogrebnyak
( Credits of this Chelsea vs Reading 2012 Highlights Video with uploaders)
No Technology 1 Reading FC 0
Shit like this can be the reason for a side like Reading to go down at the end of the season
BRING IN TECHNOLOGY- THAT IS BLATANTLY OFFSIDE
funny that both cfc scorers from last time scored in a similar manner this game too (lampard pen and b.ivanovic goal)
this is DEMATIOV technic.wait friends he can do more wins in EPL
This is DEMATIOVS team and technic
Hazard’s looking good but Chelsea bribe the linesman like it happened with Wigan last season!
mite just b d boost torres requires
Offside? Didn’t need Torres’ goal to win.
Didnt need Torres goal to win? if its a draw the keeper wouldn’t come off from his line during the last attack..
Even if it was offside we didn’t need that goal to win, and how would anyone know if a team bribed a linesmen or referees.This is why I hate modern football everyone has an excuse for his team losing.
Its interesting that the new teams are bringing more trouble than we expected,but the mere truth is that chelsea were supposed to delt with the Royals.
Yea it did finish 4-2 but Torres’ goal did make a difference. If it had not been given due to offside then Reading’s goalkeeper wouldnt’ve gone up for the corner, hence the Ivanovic goal. So yes they did need Torres’ goal to win.
Chelsea need to be good when it comes to striking part
minus torres goal, i think chelsea fc won the match. plz football loveers lets us accept the fate that chelsea is the champion.up chelsea
Cracking header from Pogrebnyak- the best goal out of the six
It is not torres’s or chelsea’s mistake. Football’s all about skill and luck. This time the luck goes with torres. But luck itself does not do it all. It also requires skill. Torres has used his wonderful skill to make good use of his lucky oppertunity.
With Hazard, all shall be well with us ” Chelsea”
Whatevr torres scored na nd chelsea r champions
This season is made for chelsea alone, with de help of all de player an our good keeper.up chelsea.keep it up blues
we will do better than this in our next match
I think chelsea should backup their striking force and essien should be on the starting line up
I think essien should be part of the first eleven instead of mikel
J. Tt5:-[
i also thought that essien is better to be in first eleven instead of mikel
Essien is best then Lampad & Mikel
CHELSEA CHELSEA
With the two matches Chelsea hav play,I think Eden Hazard is the Best Player in the team n will continue to be.
Chelsae players should try and improve on their playing and try and be utilising their chances.